Suddenly the muse fell on me and literally in 4 days this track was born. In it you can find subtle notes of spiritual suffering and great disappointment. The fact is that I was able to write only under the most negative emotions and apparently this was reflected in the track itself, because I feel only a negative impact in it.
Please listen, evaluate, criticize. Happy listening.
And as always, if you don’t like it, don’t hit me too hard :3
Thank you!
Best comments
Despite the three-act length without a https://independentcasinosites.co.uk/ proper transition, despite the poorly done distortion at the end — this, in my opinion, is almost your best track. For me, it does not carry any pronounced negative connotations; it rather feels like you were letting off steam with the music, rather than expressing anger, etc. That is, this is more a positive feeling than a negative one, and certainly a feeling characteristic of every creator.
Glad you’re not giving up 🙂
I listened to your tune, Ruzzy-Smuzzy :3
So, it creates an alarming tension, as if danger lurks for us… These are the feelings I get from listening to it.
P.s. I don’t know how to explain this, but my spider sense tells me that the balance of the composition is not maintained… First you tell us one thing, then something sharply different, then a third, and we are still impressed by the first… It’s like a film that they decided to make based on three different stories, which is why the composition, although it looks solid, each arch suffers from a lack of attention to it… That’s how I feel, Ruzzi)
A lot of time has passed, you don’t leave the image.There is no danger, a set of perceptions determines your opinion, the mortal world is boiling in a cauldron filled with information, forming a personality)
Greetings! This comment/review carries an exclusively subjective burden of my musical experience, so everything said should be taken into account, but not taken to heart.
I’ll start with the general impression. You said that everything was composed under the pressure of negative feelings. It doesn’t matter which ones, but I personally believe you that they were. On a five-point scale, I’ll give everything I heard a four: compositionally, in general, everything was done with dignity; there is originality, it doesn’t feel like something has been copied; the style and harmony of the arrangement are also consistent — there is no feeling that something does not fit in with the other instruments and, with the exception of some moments, the track goes through in one breath. But there are still some flaws that I will point out below.
For a more normal analysis, I decided to divide the composition into semantic segments. And in this vein, I’ll go through the list:
1(0:00) — intro. It turned out to be cheerful, interest in the development of the musical theme does not disappear. The sounds are chosen harmoniously and do not merge into cacophony. In general, there are no visible under or little, weak. But it would be more interesting if during the decay you slightly changed the order of pressing the keys on the synthesizer. And two seconds of sound distortion looked crumpled — as a result, the tension is lost.
2(0:44) — main part. The beat is perceived well for the first time, without boredom. And also harmonious. But essentially you repeat everything that happened at the beginning (then drums appear), you need to somehow diversify the beat (at least put emphasis on the kick drum or drum part).
3 (1:44) — loss, you handled it flexibly and pleasantly. Already diversified the games slightly. But the approach to the second main part (one could call it the chorus) turned out a little clumsy and forced.
4(2:21) — main part (modified). Piano accent (one note at a time). And it (especially playing one key at a time) seems small enough to evoke any great emotions in the listener (me). He would like to play a duet with a synthesizer (and on this “stage” only a few keys on the piano are alive and trying to convey something to the listener.
5 (3:22) — creation of a new main part (I would call it the culmination of the track). I really liked it, there was no feeling of procrastination of one topic, it seemed like a kind of re-presentation in a new key (thanks to the effects). And only here you gave a little freedom to the poor piano.
6(3:47) — ending of the track. The same tricks with sound stuttering do not look notorious. I feel like you were able to put a clear point in this 4-minute sentence. But (yes, again) try to diversify this part with interesting inserts — imagine that you want to say something for the last time to someone who is listening to it all and assemble a speech from this in the form of sounds and effects.
Conclusion. Having listened to your other works, I can say for sure that you have talent. You know how to come up with a melody, but the presentation is lame in places (more specifically, expression, sensuality). You need to go all out with your emotions, so that each new turn in the composition lifts you higher and higher. And when you tell yourself that you won’t be able to create something stronger than the current one, then move on to the next segments of your creative journey. Good luck!:)
Postscript. You can say “I love you” in a hundred languages and it won’t get boring, but when such a moment comes, you will have to dodge not just three words in one language, but a ton of others that decorate the original text, phrases and phrases. And one more thing: it’s not enough to have wings to reach the absolute top — you also need to be able to flap them deftly, achieving maximum effect and try to increase them. Without this there is no way. That’s all for sure now :))
Добавить комментарий